Tough to restore Uddhav govt even if we find governor wrong: Supreme Court
At the conclusion of the nine-day marathon arguments related to the validity of rebel Shiv Sena MLAs toppling the Maha Vikas Aghadi government last year, the Supreme Court on Thursday said it could be difficult to reinstate the Uddhav Thackeray government even if it finds then Maharashtra governor Bhagat Singh Koshyari’s decision to ask then chief minister (Uddhav) to face trust vote unconstitutional.
During the concluding submissions of senior advocate A M Singhvi, a bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices M R Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P S Narasimha asked, “If on analysis of the arguments from both sides and on scrutiny of documents, we conclude that the governor had no material to ask the CM to face call a trust vote on June 30, what consequential relief should be granted?” Singhvi promptly replied that the only relief that could be given, in such an eventuality, will be restoring the MVA government. To that, the bench said, “How can we reinstate a government which itself admitted having lost majority in the House by resigning voluntarily without facing the trust vote?”
“If you had faced the trust vote, then on finding that the governor’s decision was unconstitutional, we could have set aside the trust vote. But you did not want to face the trust vote. If we restore you now, it would create a constitutional conundrum,” the CJI said. The bench reserved its verdict on the petitions.
